Daily Bulletin


  • Written by Republished with permission
New Zealand's repeal of “year and a day” rule expands liability for homicide

This week, the New Zealand Parliament passed the Crimes Amendment Bill, abolishing the “year and a day” rule. This rule meant that no one could be liable for killing another person unless that person died within a year and a day of the act that caused their death.

This rule was one of the reasons why homicide charges were not laid against anyone for the deaths of 115 people in a building that collapsed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, even though a Royal Commission of Inquiry found the building did not meet code requirements. No one could be prosecuted for homicide because the earthquake occurred many years after the building was constructed - outside of “a year and a day”.

Doing away with the rule raises some interesting questions, both in relation to any proposed euthanasia laws and homicide more generally.

Read more: How antiquated legal language undermines complainants in cases of sexual assault

Operating and substantial cause of death

For someone to be guilty of homicide – whether it is murder or manslaughter – they must have some intention or fault and their act must be an “operating cause and a substantial cause” of death. This phrase comes from English case law and it essentially means that the original wound must be operating on the victim at the time of their death and be a substantial, if not the only, cause of death. This is not always easy to establish, especially when other events intervene.

Last year in England, Berlinah Wallace was charged with murdering her ex-partner, Mark van Dongen, after she threw sulphuric acid on him. What is unusual about this case is that Van Dongen did not die from the acid. His face and body were severely scarred, he was paralysed from the neck down, lost most of his vision and his lower left leg had to be amputated.

He spent more than a year in hospital and then went to Belgium where he successfully applied for euthanasia. Wallace was acquitted of murder, but she was found guilty of throwing a corrosive substance with intent, and was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of 12 years.

In 1996, England and Wales abolished the year and a day rule so the fact that Van Dongen died more than a year after the acid attack did not prevent Wallace being charged. But a central issue in the case was whether her actions were the legal cause of death. The immediate cause of death was the actions of the doctors at the euthanasia clinic, but the jury had to decide whether the doctors’ actions made Wallace’s act of throwing acid legally inoperative as a cause of death.

The fact that she was acquitted of murder suggests the jury was not satisfied her actions were a substantial and operating cause of death, or that it was not reasonably foreseeable that Van Dongen might choose euthanasia as a result of his injuries.

Responsibility for our actions

While the year and a day rule is arbitrary, its repeal does raise some questions about the point at which we stop being responsible for the consequences of our actions. Justice minister Andrew Little said:

advances in medical science and life support machines that may keep victims alive for longer than a year and a day mean there is no longer any justification for this rule.

But from another perspective, this may be precisely why the rule is needed. While people do need to be accountable for harming others, especially if they intend to kill someone, other cases might require some reasonable limits.

Imagine a defendant whose negligent driving caused another person serious injuries, but because of “advances in medical science” the injured person lived for another ten years before finally succumbing to their injuries. Even if death was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the injury, a decade is a long time for a person to be uncertain of potential criminal liability, especially for homicide.

Some difficult questions

Euthanasia also raises some issues. In New Zealand, the Select Committee is due to report back on the End of Life Bill at the end of March. If we go ahead with some form of “assisted dying”, this could also extend the scope of liability beyond current limits.

Read more: The fear that dare not speak its name: how language plays a role in the assisted dying debate

The law generally says that we take our victims as we find them – if they have a particular vulnerability (a weak heart, for example,) that doesn’t affect our liability for harming them. This may be fair enough when it comes to murder, but to what extent should a defendant’s liability for manslaughter depend upon a victim’s voluntary decision to end their own life, even if they do have a susceptibility toward, say, self-harm?

This is a difficult question and I don’t suggest reinstating the year and a day rule is an answer. But its repeal means we may have to rethink the traditional criminal law approach to causation in homicide cases.

Authors: Republished with permission

Read more http://theconversation.com/new-zealands-repeal-of-year-and-a-day-rule-expands-liability-for-homicide-113042

The Conversation


Senator Canavan: Statement on Queensland Government's decision on Adani

I welcome the Queensland Government's announcement regarding timelines for Adani's approvals, but I don't thank them. The thanks go to the people of Central Queensland who have forced this outcome t...

Senator Canavan - avatar Senator Canavan

Australians reject Labor’s marine park lock outs

Australians have rejected Labor’s plans to return to their disastrous marine park lock outs policy. Assistant Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources Richard Colbeck said the strong result fo...

Senator Colbeck - avatar Senator Colbeck

Alan Jones interview with Scott Morrison after the election win

ALAN JONES: Prime Minister good morning. PRIME MINISTER: Good morning Alan, how are you? JONES: Listen, you might have got up on Saturday, but the team didn’t. [Laughter] PRIME MINISTER: Well, e...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Business News

How To Protect Your Industry From Hazardous Material

Some industries regularly generate significant amount of hazardous dust and other contaminants. When this is the case, you must focus on finding a suitable industrial vacuum to ensure that people work...

News Company - avatar News Company

Advice For Running A New Business

Taking on the responsibility of running a new business can be extremely satisfying and also very nerve-wracking all at the same time. Officially opening up for business and starting to sell your pro...

News Company - avatar News Company

Essential Tips for Successfully Shipping Products to Indonesia

As an Australian business owner who has their sights set on expanding operations this year, it makes sense to look into the potential for tapping into the Indonesian market. With a vibrant economy, ...

Toby Edwards - avatar Toby Edwards


5 Cities in England That Should Be on Your List

England is a beautiful and rich country. It has a great history and one of the most important people of our time are from this majestic country. Breathtaking landscapes, magnificent architecture, and ...

Goran Kezić - avatar Goran Kezić

Top 3 Reasons to Visit a Wellness Retreat in Bali

If you’re looking for beauty, relaxation and recuperation, Bali could be the destination for you. In fact, it’s so magical, it’s known as the Island of the Gods. Just looking at its crystal clear wa...

News Company - avatar News Company

7 Ultimate Things to do in Australia

Australia is a beautiful and great tourist destination. It rightfully fits the description of an adventure playground being home to a wide variety of activities and attractions for all ages and ta...

News Company - avatar News Company