Daily BulletinHoliday Centre

The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation
imageThe determined avoidance of reference to human rights is a tactic, by both sides of politics, to avoid accountability.AAP/Mick Tsikas

Human rights is largely absent from public policy debate in Australia. Quite simply, human rights don’t matter when public leaders and commentators assess the merits of policy and laws. That is both remarkable and entirely understandable.

It is remarkable for two reasons. One is that human rights do matter in public debate in nearly every other country. The US is an exception – its “rights” discussion refers almost exclusively to its own arcane, idiosyncratic and irrelevant-to-Australia “Bill of Rights”. Elsewhere, public debate is informed by international human rights guarantees, translated into local law.

That leads to another reason why the absence of human rights in public debate in Australia is remarkable. Australia has signed up to those same human rights guarantees and it reports regularly to the United Nations on its compliance with its international obligations. So, Australia declares to the world its support for human rights, but it scarcely refers to the idea in its own affairs.

But that is understandable. No-one is inclined to refer to human rights in public debate in Australia when its leaders either avoid the idea or attack it, and the news media are silent on it.

Why is this so?

Why, if there is a global idea which a country has officially adopted, does it reject it?

The answer lies, in part, in power and control. The determined avoidance of reference to human rights is a tactic, by both sides of politics, to avoid accountability. Human rights are an identifiable, globally acknowledged, documented and systematic set of standards for state conduct.

A government can choose – as the ACT and Victorian governments have done – to hold themselves accountable to such standards. But successive federal governments steadfastly refuse to do the same.

This leaves the public debate without any grounding. In the current debate over stripping dual nationals involved in terrorism of their citizenship, the news media has latched on to “unconstitutional” as a measure of legitimacy for the proposal.

Government MP Luke Simpkins conceded:

The only question on our side has been whether it would be subject to a High Court challenge.

Actually, no, that is not the only question. The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, for example, will ask a ‘human rights’ question of the proposal, as it does of every proposed new law. Occasionally, the committee’s human rights analyses are noticed, but for the most part public policy debate is stuck on partisan arguments of what is claimed to be “common sense”, or passing the pub test.

There remains the possibility that the stripping of citizenship will operate retrospectively. No doubt the Intelligence and Security Committee would consider “legal views” on the issue, but the position under Australia’s international obligation is unequivocal: the law is never permitted to impose a penalty retrospectively for conduct that was not unlawful at the time. A law that does so violates an absolute and fundamental human right.

The role human rights can play

Most policy debate can be informed by human rights considerations. These include wages for people with disabilities, higher education funding, same-sex marriage, national security measures, data retention and so on. For each of these, human rights standards offer a universal point of reference for public debate.

However, it is much easier for a government to exercise power by avoiding or delegitimising identifiable criteria for accountability. This means that battles for ideas and values take place on shifting territory, where language can change, perspectives can switch, and interests can be variously promoted and sidelined.

The system and language of human rights are far from being the crude “trump” and international directive that they are demonised as. Much of the apprehension about human rights in public debate stems from the lack of familiarity and understanding.

A human rights debate about, say, metadata laws identifies competing concerns for public safety and privacy, and engages in a systematic process of reconciling the two to ensure that both are met to the greatest possible degree.

Similarly, a human rights assessment of industrial laws will reconcile competing concerns for economic efficiency and freedom of association.

This type of human rights thinking is not hard. Politicians, bureaucrats and service providers in the ACT and Victoria are becoming well used to it under their local human rights laws. But human rights thinking is threatening to those who wish to avoid having to account for their conduct against clear and widely accepted criteria.

So, human rights don’t matter in public debate in Australia because they are treated – by those who are threatened by them – as if they don’t matter. This doesn’t – and I can’t – explain why the news media and public commentators do not turn to human rights standards as a point of reference.

There is no shortage or material for the media to work with. The Australian Human Rights Commission, the Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights and the Human Rights Law Centre are just three sources of human rights analysis of current policy.

The response to a challenge to a policy proponent that a proposal appears to breach Australia’s human rights obligations should be telling. The answer can only be “I don’t care”, or “No it doesn’t” – and the latter requires some explanation.

It suits both sides of politics to avoid having to explain themselves in human rights terms. It’s time they were called to account.

Simon Rice is the external legal adviser to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, and a donor to The Conversation.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/human-rights-dont-matter-in-our-public-debate-but-they-should-43771

The Conversation


Road and rail boost for Queensland economy

$1.9 BILLION ROAD AND RAIL BOOST FOR QUEENSLAND ECONOMY    A $1.9 billion road and rail package will boost the Queensland economy and drive more jobs, while getting people home sooner and safer...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister - Step up in drought budget support

Drought-hit farmers, small businesses and rural towns are set for an immediate cash injection to keep stock fed and watered, keep businesses open, keep locals in work and pump funds into local eco...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

David Littleproud MP interview with Tom Connell

Interview with Tom Connell – Sky News NewsDay   The Coalition’s latest drought support package   TOM CONNELL: David Littleproud, thanks for your time. We've got this drought package going throug...

Tom Connell - avatar Tom Connell

Business News

The New Technology That Solves Silicosis Epidemic

An Australian-invented revolutionary technology could prevent the lives that are lost each year from silicosis.   Silicosis is a lung disease caused by breathing in tiny bits of silica, a mineral...

Adam Santarossa - avatar Adam Santarossa

Latest Developments in the Casino Industry in Australia

It is not surprising to note that more than 85% of the population in Australia engages in some form of gambling or the other. Annually, millions of AUD is generated to the coffers of the country. ...

News Company - avatar News Company

Decathlon Group: Global sporting brand opens its third store

International sporting brand Decathlon today opened its much anticipated third store in Victoria.    Located at 405 Boundary Road, Moorabbin Airport, the store extends the brand’s footprint across V...

Tess Sanders Lazarus - avatar Tess Sanders Lazarus


Travel Safety Checklist for Australians

Travelling is a fun and enriching activity that exposes you to new sights, broadens your horizons, and lets you encounter people from all walks of life. This applies no matter where your destination...

News Company - avatar News Company

Experimental retail concept to showcase Australian products to Chinese travellers

Australian company, Reach China, is launching an innovative new experiential retail concept called a ‘Touch, Learn & Order’ TLO Store, that will be rolled out across Australia and China to provi...

Tess Sanders Lazarus - avatar Tess Sanders Lazarus

Planning a High School Educational Trip: Useful Pointers to Keep in Mind

Planning and managing an educational trip is not an easy job for teachers, especially if the group consists of high school teenagers! At the same time, high schoolers are also at an age where they...

News Company - avatar News Company