Daily Bulletin


The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation
imageJoining the US Navy airstrikes, are we doing enough?Mircea Rosca from EPA

In the wake of the terrorist attacks against British citizens in Tunisia, the feeling in government is that something must be done. But what kind of response are we talking about?

Prime minister David Cameron has said that he wants to step up intervention in Syria but his hands are tied by a 2013 parliamentary vote. This restricts Britain’s bombing campaign against Islamic State to the borders of Iraq.

Now it seems British pilots have extended their activities and taken part in attacks in Syria while working with US forces. This suggests the government has already decided how to up the ante in its fight against Islamic terrorism.

imageJulian Lewis, chairman of the defence committeefrom www.parliament.uk

Julian Lewis, the chairman of the UK parliament’s defence committee, has since taken issue with the government, accusing it of making up its Syria strategy “on the hoof” and warning that if Cameron wants MPs to support intervention, he needs to come up with something much more coherent to convince them.

With the government’s room for manoeuvre hemmed in by a sceptical parliament and a wafer thin majority, what do these developments say about British strategy? Is Julian Lewis right to argue that the government is making up strategy as it goes along?

‘Full spectrum’ response

What we know about the involvement of UK pilots in US bombing campaigns comes from a Freedom of Information request made by human rights organisation Reprieve. The government’s response was dated June 15 – 11 days before the attacks in Tunisia.

For some time now we’ve also known that Royal Navy and RAF pilots have been training with the US Navy in preparation for taking delivery of the new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers.

Bearing in mind the date of the Tunisian attack and the ongoing training of British pilots, the escalation of British military activity over Syria was evidently not a direct response to the attacks in Tunisia.

These Syria operations did not demonstrate the British government’s strategic intent. They were more likely aimed at enabling British forces to collate operational and tactical information should a decision be taken to expand the fight against IS beyond Iraq.

But as Cameron faces increasing pressure to act on the threat posed by terrorism and Islamic State, linking the routine embedding of British personnel to a strategic narrative that suggests something is being done has its advantages. On the back foot since the 2013 vote, hawkish commentators have found it easy to criticise Cameron for his apparent lack of interest in foreign policy.

F-18 operations over Syria do therefore suggest that there is more substance to Cameron’s claim that the government will take a “full-spectrum response” to attacks in Tunisia. Any suggestion that airstrikes in Syria will result in a decline of terrorist activity in Tunisia, or anywhere else for that matter, is nonetheless open to considerable doubt.

Lacking influence

Without a ground force, the UK’s ability to play a significant part in operations in Syria is severely limited. Instead British airstrikes have to be coordinated with the activities of allies and proxy armies. Considering the limited effectiveness of Western proxies, however, it seems unlikely that airstrikes alone will produce the sorts of battlefield results that might demonstrate the government is having an effect on Islamic State.

imageAnti-airstrike demonstrations outside Westminster, 2013Facundo Arrizabalaga/EPA

A more likely scenario is that airstrikes will engergise terrorist networks keen on attacking British targets. If this is to be stopped then sufficient counter-terrorist capability will need to be in place to deal with the resultant terror attacks.

If viewed generously, the government’s “full spectrum” response is about containment. The objective is to confine insecurity to the Middle East and manage the conflict through precision strikes and counter-terrorism activities. Viewed more cynically, British actions will cause more insecurity at home and abroad. Airstrikes won’t put an end to the turmoil in the Middle East and may encourage extremism at home. They certainly won’t protect Syrians.

Considering the relative decline of British military power, Lewis' observations may well be right. Cameron’s “full spectrum” response is more rhetoric than strategy.

Matthew Ford does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/david-cameron-is-making-up-his-syria-strategy-as-he-goes-along-and-its-not-working-44931

Writers Wanted

Morrison remains very popular in Newspoll as the Coalition easily retains Groom in byelection

arrow_forward

What Australia can learn from New Zealand: a new perspective on that tricky trans-Tasman relationship

arrow_forward

The Conversation
INTERWEBS DIGITAL AGENCY

Politics

Prime Minister Interview with Ben Fordham, 2GB

BEN FORDHAM: Scott Morrison, good morning to you.    PRIME MINISTER: Good morning, Ben. How are you?    FORDHAM: Good. How many days have you got to go?   PRIME MINISTER: I've got another we...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News

KIERAN GILBERT: Kieran Gilbert here with you and the Prime Minister joins me. Prime Minister, thanks so much for your time.  PRIME MINISTER: G'day Kieran.  GILBERT: An assumption a vaccine is ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Did BLM Really Change the US Police Work?

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has proven that the power of the state rests in the hands of the people it governs. Following the death of 46-year-old black American George Floyd in a case of ...

a Guest Writer - avatar a Guest Writer

Business News

Nisbets’ Collab with The Lobby is Showing the Sexy Side of Hospitality Supply

Hospitality supply services might not immediately make you think ‘sexy’. But when a barkeep in a moodily lit bar holds up the perfectly formed juniper gin balloon or catches the light in the edg...

The Atticism - avatar The Atticism

Buy Instagram Followers And Likes Now

Do you like to buy followers on Instagram? Just give a simple Google search on the internet, and there will be an abounding of seeking outcomes full of businesses offering such services. But, th...

News Co - avatar News Co

Cybersecurity data means nothing to business leaders without context

Top business leaders are starting to realise the widespread impact a cyberattack can have on a business. Unfortunately, according to a study by Forrester Consulting commissioned by Tenable, some...

Scott McKinnel, ANZ Country Manager, Tenable - avatar Scott McKinnel, ANZ Country Manager, Tenable



News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion