Handling Objections with AI: Can Machines Navigate Tough Phone Conversations?

Sales and customer interaction is on the verge of drastic transformation with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) especially in telephonic interactions. Yet one of the factors that companies must consider is whether artificial intelligence can successfully overcome objections, a difficult feat on the sales side over the phone. Exploring what AI can do when it comes to judging an objection realizes the opportunities and limitations that AI has in transaction settings.

The Nature of an Objection and Whether Humans or AIs Are Better Suited to Handle Them

An objection essentially is a feeling of doubt, a questionable take on value, or uncertainty from the perspective of the prospect. To effectively overcome such an objection, however, one must be not only persuasive and knowledgeable about the product but also possess emotional intelligence and empathy. Thus, the human condition has always been better suited for picking up on nuances of tone, inflection, volume, and ancillary emotional clues and adapting persuasion accordingly. Smart phone calls using AI aim to bridge this gap by analyzing voice cues in real time and adjusting responses to handle objections more naturally and effectively. When/if AIs can process this information just as easily, however, it will determine how well (or not) they would respond to such objections.

The Ways in Which AI Would Excel at Overcoming Objections

One of the greatest advantages that AI would have over humans when it comes to overcoming objections is the access to a data-driven response. AI based systems can instantly analyze and compute prior success/failure statistics from millions of prior conversations and assess what kinds of responses either eliminated the objection or at least changed the conversation into a potential sales opportunity. These statistics could involve commonalities tied to successful rebuttals or effective conversational frameworks that AIs can employ systematically and consistently across all sales calls for improved efficiency and reliability.

Emotional Intelligence for Overcoming Objections Is Key

While data and consistency rule the roost, emotional intelligence for overcoming objections is critical. A human salesperson has access to unmatched empathic qualities, attuning to the emotional subtext behind objections and offering suitable feedback. While AIs are getting smarter, they still don't operate on the same emotionally intelligent level as humans and can't be trained in empathy and appropriate emotional response on the same levels. Thus, training an AI to overcome objections through emotional intelligence remains a daunting task, which can hinder an AI's ability to tackle more emotionally based sales objections.

AI Competes Early with Objections

One advantage of AI in objection management is that it identifies objections early on. With advanced speech recognition and natural language processing devices, AI can determine where someone is wavering through specific communication patterns or hesitations in the conversation indicating that an objection may lie. By identifying the subtle clues early on, the AI gets (or human) the opportunity to quell a concern before it balloons into a larger situation, keeping the call running smoothly and the prospect happier.

AI Needs Extensive Training for Complicated Communications

A vital requirement for any AI system to effectively function through objections is extensive training and continued training. The more an AI is exposed to certain types of conversations, nuanced objections, and customer reactions, the easier it may be for the business to train the AI over time with adaptability and accuracy of response. Through comprehensive machine learning, the AI might one day respond to complex situations unprompted, fluidly changing courses of action based on a continual flow of conversation and even acts of commissioned response by the individual prospect.

Why Humans Are Better: Flexibility, Nuance, and More

Despite the rapid technological advancement of AI, humans in the sales representative role are still at an advantage when it comes to objection handling. For example, two areas where humans outperform include flexibility and nuance. When a human is caught off guard by an objection, especially one that's very niche and personal to the customer, intuitive changes to approach can happen right then and there through creative problem solving and emotional cues. While AI can be trained to give the semblance of flexibility, relative to its training, the ability to change on a dime to satisfy a person's need in the moment as based upon contextual clues is not as easily accomplished comparative to human agents.

The Best of Both Worlds AI and Human Approaches for the Best Results

The best way to approach objection handling is to use AI and human capabilities in tandem. AI can address first or low-level objections, and make sure that a human representative has the time to delve into more complex, emotional issues. Moreover, with a human element able to empathize, using AI as a first step for data collection and low-level objections may compound a holistic experience for the customer. This provides business professionals with all the tools necessary to not only be concise with objection handling but effective in overall sales and customer experience.

Ethical Considerations Regarding AI for Objection Handling Must Be Addressed

Business considerations should include ethical means of operation relative to objection handling via AI. For one, prospects and customers should know when they are speaking to AI and what type of data and information is gathered by these bots. A level of transparency goes a long way with customer trust. In addition, businesses who have legitimately obtained their prospects require the use of AI tools to respect data privacy and how to navigate sensitive details that AI obtains on calls. Anything less than ethically sound treatment of customers during and after engagement will destroy not only that businesses reputation, but also the prospects for AI sales endeavors.

The Metrics Measured to Assess AI and Subsequent Findings

According to a formal evaluation of whether or not AI successfully handled objections, companies should track the following metrics to assess AI's effectiveness in handling objections: objection handling percentages, call conversion percentages, customer satisfaction scores, quality of engagement scores. By evaluating performance over time, insights are gained as to where AI exceeds expectations, where it does not and what changes to conversational techniques are warranted. Continuous evaluation makes sure that the AI gets better at handling objections over time to close the distance between its abilities and those of a human.

Future Trends in AI Objection Handling

There are many improvements to AI's ability to handle objections in the future. For instance, emerging technologies like advanced empathy algorithms, real-time voice pattern detection and emotion detection, deeper situational contextual awareness will significantly expand AI's ability to process complex objections in not only more humane ways but also more effective ones. Companies that recognize such developments in technology will be leaders in their fields, possessing a competitive advantage by always adjusting their AI-based objection responses to offer more and more effective customer experiences.

Avoiding Common Mistakes in AI Objection Handling

AI objection handling fails mostly due to over reliance on overly scripted proceedings, failing to train the systems enough regarding emotional context and implications, and not shifting as conversations shift rapidly. When AI responses are overly structured or redundant in execution due to a pre-scripted parameters plan, conversations become stale and de-humanized very quickly. Prospects are aware that they are speaking to a robot and become frustrated or disenchanted; as a result, customer satisfaction levels drop with compounded opportunities for conversion.

In addition, failing to train on emotional context blindsides AI into either successfully navigating no-nuanced objections or those which are emotionally-driven. Without extensive awareness of emotional cues from humans, nuanced shifts in conversation, and motivations behind behaviors and questions, AI either does not respond correctly and/or with the sensitivity required, breaking trust and the customer experience in the process. 

The same is true when AI is not adjusted; failure to become adjusted in real-time to customer feedback and evolving conversational issues renders AI ineffective as well since what was relevant five minutes ago may not be of relevance two minutes later. Therefore, such breaches create a disconnect from what should have been expected from the conversation to what ended up happening.

Organizations can take steps to avoid these issues, however. For example, initial training datasets should be adjusted and supplemented over time so that AI engages with various objections, related feelings, and topical discussions. Adding topicality means that AIs, from the most practical perspective, become more adjustable, fluid, and attuned to a variety of situations that make flowing through objection-based discussions easier. In addition, ongoing conversational developments can be engaged through ongoing assessment monitoring and evaluating what prospects say and how they react in conversations can teach organizations' technologies how to better respond naturally to sustained objection conversations.

Thus, by establishing a comprehensive, ongoing adjustment of AI solutions that avoids the pitfalls we've covered thus far, companies create an engaging conversational environment where AIs always sound fluid, engaged, and empathetic. Prospects will be more likely to remain on the line and grateful for the conversation experience, in addition to their experiential satisfaction during the discussion. Ultimately, those organizations seeking solutions ahead of time to improve objection handling capabilities through purposeful adjustments and strategic training will find conversational wins, increased prospect satisfaction, and overall improved sales outcomes.

Preparing Sales Teams for Collaboration with AI

AI objection handling success depends on significant training that does not stop with the sales staff so they understand all the avenues available to them with the technology. Otherwise, if agents do not understand what it can and cannot do and where their human intervention might be necessary they may take cues as a passive disinterest in a conversation an AI shouldn't control. Yet empowered with this all-inclusive knowledge, sales staff will be poised to step in when AI can no longer assist a tech-sales call stall or become too mechanical, it can reflect poorly on the company unless a salesperson jumps in to steer it back on course with some empathy and common sense.

Additionally, extensive rely and guidelines must be executed for sales staff to know what collaborative efforts work so that these human-responsible discussions dovetail nicely with those conducted by AI-based software. For example, everything from acknowledging AI-supplied feedback to guiding a transaction from machine- to human-handling to framing their replies so that AI understands them and responds effectively down the line. Training with these transitory efforts keeps conversations consistent, giving prospects reasons to stay polite, engaged, and appropriately situationally aware of every step of the sale process.

In addition, the training itself will occur with live situations, including simulated objection opportunities trained through practical applications. The more salespersons encounter various points of engagement through role-playing and live exercises, the better such representatives can streamline successful engagement for themselves with AI. They can counter complicated and intensely emotional objections through this life-based training, as human emotion, adaptability, and problem-solving complement what an AI can offer in collated information and predictive analytics.

Training correctly will also enable collaboration efforts for the best AI or human-trained representative actions needed, and no overlapping of too detrimental boundaries. Easily defined roles make objection resolution much more manageable, with proper, frictionless, satisfying engagements having long-term positive effects on any human-customer relationship. When human-trained representatives understand how to best function alongside those trained by AIs for mutual benefit and vice versa, they'll have greater customer satisfaction, enjoyment over successive engagements, and additional sales effectiveness.

Thus, with thorough, continuous and purposeful training relative to AI advancements supplemented by people skills acquired through human relationship training companies are better poised to develop a dynamic, trained sales staff. This empowers them to not only more effectively manage objections, but also allows companies to preserve the integrity of prospect interaction, uniformity of prospect engagement and ultimate efficacy of sales results over time.

• Next