Daily Bulletin

The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation
imageThe government has sent a clear message that it does not trust the Australia Council to do its bidding.hobvias sudoneighm

The budget statement in relation to the arts begins:

Once again, the interests of Australia’s cultural sector have been protected and advanced by the 2015-16 Budget (author’s italics).

This statement seems somewhat ironic in view of the recommendations that follow.

The 2015 Budget will take ministerial intervention in arts decision making to a whole new level. Who is being protected and how will the arts be advanced?

The Budget contains a new fund called a National Programme for Excellence in the Arts, which it is going to support with funding of A$104.8 million over four years. The implications of this recommendation need to be explored.

If we recall in the 2014 Budget the government cut A$87.1 million over four years from funding to arts programs across several portfolios.

So now it seems that over the next four years the arts budget will gain a net increase of A$17.7 million under the Abbott government, after the previous cut is taken into account.

As the Australia Council presently gets A$185 million, this new funding will represent around 57% of the current funding for the arts. But who will get this additional funding, how will it be distributed and what is underpinning the recommendation?


First, this 2015 funding programme suggests that “excellence” at present is not funded – or alternatively that the government is creating a new definition of it.

The Australia Council has had “excellence” in its funding criteria from the beginning but the notion of what is meant by excellence is always contested.

There has been a view that “excellence” is a code word for large and important rather than excellent in terms of the quality of the work. Major organisations by their nature are seen as excellent whereas medium and smaller organisations are not.

As larger organisations under the Australia Council budget already get the majority of its overall funding, this new fund would seem to be rewarding the richer and bigger organisations once more.

Second, the establishment of a new large arts funding program in Canberra immediately suggests that at best the Minister is second-guessing the Australia Council’s process and policies and at worst planning a new regime in which the Australia Council’s raison d’être is rapidly eroded.

Separating arts funding decisions from the whims of the minster of the day is a principle that has been in place in Australia since the formal establishment of the Australia Council in 1975.

While there have always been challenges to this process, this principle of “arms-length funding” has been seen as important for the protection of the arts and free speech in a broader context.

Who decides?

For whatever reason, politicians often think they are better informed about what should be funded in the arts than arts peers. George Brandis and the Abbott government may be taking this to another level.

The aim of the new fund is:

to support endowments, international touring and strategic projects, with an emphasis on attracting private sector support […] it will allow for a truly national approach to arts funding.

So the government is showing a desire to again increase private-sector support for the arts (they had already given an increase of A$5.3 million to the Creative Partnerships Program in 2014).

The use of the term “strategic” would suggest they wish to fund their own preferences and be more “directional” about what is funded. But the use of the term “national” suggests that in their view the Australia Council is not playing a “national” role.

Perhaps most disturbing of all is the comment that “Arts funding has until now been limited almost exclusively to projects favoured by the Australia Council”.

This suggests that there is a whole realm of other arts activity that is presently ignored by the Australia Council which this government is now going to fund. At the same time the government is taking back the Visions of Australia Program and the Festivals Program from the Australia Council to Canberra.

Whatever else might be said about this budget in relation to the arts, this government is saying clearly that it does not trust the Australia Council to do its bidding and is therefore going to pursue its own funding agenda for the arts.

See also:

There’s money for the arts in the budget – but with strings attachedArms length? Forget it – it’s back to the Menzies era for arts funding

Jo Caust has undertaken consultation work for the Australia Council.

Authors: The Conversation

Read more http://theconversation.com/a-budget-to-rebuild-trust-but-not-trust-in-the-australia-council-41750

Writers Wanted

Major reform of surveillance laws proposed by review


Thank you to everyone who helped The Conversation survive (and thrive) in 2020


The Conversation


Prime Minister Interview with Ben Fordham, 2GB

BEN FORDHAM: Scott Morrison, good morning to you.    PRIME MINISTER: Good morning, Ben. How are you?    FORDHAM: Good. How many days have you got to go?   PRIME MINISTER: I've got another we...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News

KIERAN GILBERT: Kieran Gilbert here with you and the Prime Minister joins me. Prime Minister, thanks so much for your time.  PRIME MINISTER: G'day Kieran.  GILBERT: An assumption a vaccine is ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Did BLM Really Change the US Police Work?

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has proven that the power of the state rests in the hands of the people it governs. Following the death of 46-year-old black American George Floyd in a case of ...

a Guest Writer - avatar a Guest Writer

Business News

How to Find the Best SEO Services Company That Offers Guaranteed Results

As a business owner, you have to be strategic about how you’ll be able to reach your target market. That is why entrepreneurs implement various marketing tactics to reach their goals. With today...

News Co - avatar News Co

Top Reasons Why Your Business Needs SEO

SEO is crucial for the ranking of a website. You may think that SEO offers greater searchability while it can do more than this. The most cost-effective tool for the survival of smalls businesse...

News Co - avatar News Co

Nisbets’ Collab with The Lobby is Showing the Sexy Side of Hospitality Supply

Hospitality supply services might not immediately make you think ‘sexy’. But when a barkeep in a moodily lit bar holds up the perfectly formed juniper gin balloon or catches the light in the edg...

The Atticism - avatar The Atticism

News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion