Daily Bulletin


The Conversation

  • Written by The Conversation Contributor
image

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has announced the creation of a A$1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund, to be jointly managed by the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA).

ARENA is designed to research and develop new clean energy technologies, while the CEFC is meant to finance projects and earn a return on investment. Both were created under the previous Labor government.

ARENA has enjoyed consistent bipartisan support (although it had some future funding cancelled under the previous budget), while the the current coalition government has always previously vowed to axe the CEFC.

So what could the new fund mean for the renewables sector?

What will the new fund do?

This announcement does three things:

  • It saves money by scrapping any extra funding originally allocated to ARENA. There will be screams of protest, but it just confirms actions that the government had already taken. It also means a move away from high risk areas where there was no requirement to get a direct return on funds.

  • It preserves the CEFC, not just the A$1 billion allocated to this new fund, but the remainder of the CEFC’s original A$10 billion.

  • It creates a fund to do research and development that sits between the existing roles of the CEFC and ARENA. It is not yet clear how investment decisions will be made, nor how exactly the projects will be financed.

The fund will accept lower returns on investment, which implies higher risk than the government currently expects of the CEFC.

Carbon pricing should drive clean energy

ARENA’s mandate was to provide grants to clean energy projects at the research and early development stage of new technologies. These are high-risk decisions, but if effective, should drive down the costs of low-emission technologies.

There are barriers to early movers, and so far the carbon market has failed to provide a clear, long-term signal for investors. Therefore, government funding is justified here.

The CEFC was born out of a political compromise to secure the previous Labor government’s climate change legislation, and the model was Britain’s Green Investment Bank. There was no obvious consideration of the countries’ different circumstances, and whether Australia needed such a body.

There was always the risk that the CEFC would be intervening in the market without adequate assessment of whether the benefits outweighed the costs. It was effectively a solution looking for a problem.

The CEFC might have a role but only if we first define the problem it seeks to solve. It is not the reduction of carbon emissions: this is the territory for climate policy.

It is not a lack of R&D funding for new clean energy technologies: ARENA was designed for that.

It is not a shortage of capital: clean energy projects are being financed in Australia by the private sector.

The problem is a shortage of projects that offer investors the necessary financial return.

The financial returns for low-emission and renewable energy investments should be driven by the emissions price that comes directly or indirectly from credible climate change policy. We had a poor version of this between 2012 and 2014 and the government’s current Emissions Reduction Fund has yet to fill the void.

Political uncertainty and poor design have led to real challenges to the Renewable Energy Target delivering its intended investment in renewable energy. Policy instruments such as state-based feed-in tariffs for household rooftop solar have provided very expensive, lesser supports.

The CEFC has a mixed record. On the one hand just deploying more of the same, such as refinancing an existing wind farm, is a poor use of public funds. However, underwriting green investment bonds such as that issued by NAB did successfully address a clear market failure.

We need low-cost technologies

The creation of the Clean Energy Innovation Fund seems intended to provide a new mandate that will target higher-risk, more innovative investments than currently supported by the CEFC. The fund will also be encouraged to look at storage and non-renewables, outside ARENA’s current remit, and that is a good thing.

However, it will be a great pity if higher risk technologies, currently funded by ARENA, are lost due to the requirement to earn a return on investment. It would be ironic if the new fund retains the mandate of the CEFC that the government had targeted for termination, while weakening ARENA which enjoyed consistent bipartisan support.

The government has indicated that the new fund will target technologies such as large-scale solar with storage, off-shore energy, biofuels and smart grids.

Despite the emphasis on large-scale solar with storage, the technology was unsuccessful under the Labor government’s Solar Flagship Program. It is making slow progress around the world and the new fund will be seeking a return on its investments.

So, it remains to be seen whether today’s announcement becomes a sound use of public funding to drive innovation in low-emission technologies through addressing real market failures, or whether the need to save money will lead to an ugly combination of lost opportunity and wasted money.

Authors: The Conversation Contributor

Read more http://theconversation.com/turnbulls-renewable-fund-could-drive-much-needed-investment-but-56732

Writers Wanted

Biden’s Senate majority doesn't just super-charge US climate action, it blazes a trail for Australia

arrow_forward

Disaster season is here — do you have a Resilience Action Plan? Here's how the small town of Tarnagulla built theirs

arrow_forward

Is your child anxious about starting school for the first time? Here's how you can help

arrow_forward

The Conversation
INTERWEBS DIGITAL AGENCY

Politics

Prime Minister's Remarks to Joint Party Room

PRIME MINISTER: Well, it is great to be back in the party room, the joint party room. It’s great to have everybody back here. It’s great to officially welcome Garth who joins us. Welcome, Garth...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Ben Fordham, 2GB

BEN FORDHAM: Scott Morrison, good morning to you.    PRIME MINISTER: Good morning, Ben. How are you?    FORDHAM: Good. How many days have you got to go?   PRIME MINISTER: I've got another we...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News

KIERAN GILBERT: Kieran Gilbert here with you and the Prime Minister joins me. Prime Minister, thanks so much for your time.  PRIME MINISTER: G'day Kieran.  GILBERT: An assumption a vaccine is ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Business News

Getting Ready to Code? These Popular and Easy Programming Languages Can Get You Started

According to HOLP (History Encyclopedia of Programing Languages), there are more than 8,000 programming languages, some dating as far back as the 18th century. Although there might be as many pr...

News Co - avatar News Co

Avoid These Mistakes When Changing up Your Executive Career

Switching up industries is a valid move at any stage in your career, even if you’re an executive. Doing so at this stage can be a lot more intimidating, however, and it can be quite difficult know...

News Co - avatar News Co

4 Costly Mistake To Avoid When Subdividing Your Property

As a property developer or landowner, the first step in developing your land is subdividing it. You subdivide the property into several lots that you either rent, sell or award to shareholders. ...

News Co - avatar News Co



News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion