Daily Bulletin

The Conversation

  • Written by Harry Hobbs, PhD Candidate, Constitutional Law and Indigenous Rights, UNSW

The Referendum Council’s final report, released on Monday, accepts and supports the calls for constitutional reform made by Indigenous delegates at regional dialogues across Australia, and agreed to at the First Nations Constitutional Convention at Uluru in May.

The report recommends meaningful reform to empower Indigenous people. But initial comments from Australia’s political leaders suggest the path to reform is still narrow.

Background to the report

Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten established the Referendum Council in December 2015. Made up of 14 Indigenous and non-Indigenous members, it was tasked with providing advice on whether, and how best, to “recognise” Indigenous Australians in the Constitution.

Its report is the conclusion of 18 months of consultation and discussion, including six months of regional dialogues with Indigenous people.

The council drew on two previous reports and public submissions from across Australia. Most significantly, it oversaw an innovative process where – for the first time – Indigenous Australians themselves were asked to deliberate collectively and report back on what constitutional recognition meant to them.

This process culminated in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. At Uluru, Indigenous people from “all points of the southern sky” spoke directly to the Australian people, and demanded constitutional reform on three points: voice, truth, and treaty.

They called for:

  • a national representative body with the power to advise parliament on laws that affect Indigenous peoples; and

  • a Makarrata Commission to supervise a process of agreement-making between governments and First Nations and undertake a public truth-telling process about Australia’s history. Makarrata is a Yolngu word meaning “a coming together after a struggle”.

Only the national representative body would involve a constitutional change. Ordinary legislation could establish the Makarrata Commission.

What does the Referendum Council report say?

The Referendum Council’s report largely endorsed the Uluru Statement.

A majority of the council recommended a referendum be held to change the Constitution to establish an Indigenous “voice to parliament”. One council member, former Liberal senator Amanda Vanstone, did not support a referendum at this time. She argued that further community consultations are necessary before a referendum is held.

The report also recommended that all Australian parliaments pass a “Declaration of Recognition”. This declaration should contain:

… inspiring and unifying words articulating Australia’s shared history, heritage and aspirations.

The council explained:

The declaration should bring together the three parts of our Australian story: our ancient First Peoples’ heritage and culture, our British institutions, and our multicultural unity.

The report also acknowledged the importance of a Makarrata Commission. It identified that treaties were overwhelmingly supported by delegates at the regional dialogues. In Dubbo, for example, a delegate explained that an “honest relationship with government” could only be achieved via respectful negotiations towards a treaty.

The council did not, however, recommend the establishment of a Makarrata Commission. As a legislative measure, it did not fall within its terms of reference.

In any case, treaties continue to progress slowly but surely at the state level.

What next?

In affirming the aspirations recorded in the Uluru Statement, the Referendum Council’s report has shifted the debate on constitutional reform.

Turnbull’s remarks on Monday show it is now highly unlikely that either major party will embark on constitutional reform unless the changes “meet the expectations of the First Australians”. This is positive. But whether changes will be proposed is another matter entirely.

Both leaders struck slightly different tones in their initial comments on the report. Turnbull was non-committal. He described the recommendation for an Indigenous “voice” as a “very big idea”, but one that was “short on detail”.

In contrast, Shorten acknowledged that a “voice” and a Makarrata Commission were legitimate aspirations that should not be pushed aside. Nonetheless, he too considered the recommendation would be a “big change”. But this is only partly true.

Constitutionally enshrining an Indigenous “voice to parliament” would be a structural change to Australia’s governance framework. Seizing on this fact, some political leaders have attacked the idea. For instance, in the days following the Uluru Statement, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce incorrectly argued the proposal was a third chamber of parliament, and insisted it “wouldn’t fly”.

Similarly, the Institute of Public Affairs’ Simon Breheny argued that an Indigenous “voice” would be “undemocratic”.

But rather than being incompatible with democracy, an Indigenous “voice to parliament” would rectify a persistent democratic fault in Australian society.

Although Indigenous Australians today enjoy “full equality” in the electoral arena, their position as an extreme minority makes it difficult for them to be heard by government. As the Uluru Statement articulates, Indigenous Australians feel powerless in their own country. A “voice to parliament” would merely empower:

… the First Peoples of Australia to speak to the parliament and to the nation about the laws and policies that affect them.

In this sense, such a body would not challenge Australian democracy. It would instead realise its ideals.

And yet, implicit in Turnbull’s and Shorten’s statements that an Indigenous “voice to parliament” would be a “big change” is the notion that it may be too difficult. It will be, but only if Australians refuse to hear Indigenous people.

Authors: Harry Hobbs, PhD Candidate, Constitutional Law and Indigenous Rights, UNSW

Read more http://theconversation.com/response-to-referendum-council-report-suggests-a-narrow-path-forward-on-indigenous-constitutional-reform-80315

Writers Wanted

Too much information: the COVID work revolution has increased digital overload


Ammonite: the remarkable real science of Mary Anning and her fossils


Patch Tuesday Commentary from Chris Goettl, Senior Director of Product Management, Security at Ivanti:


The Conversation


Prime Minister's Remarks to Joint Party Room

PRIME MINISTER: Well, it is great to be back in the party room, the joint party room. It’s great to have everybody back here. It’s great to officially welcome Garth who joins us. Welcome, Garth...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Ben Fordham, 2GB

BEN FORDHAM: Scott Morrison, good morning to you.    PRIME MINISTER: Good morning, Ben. How are you?    FORDHAM: Good. How many days have you got to go?   PRIME MINISTER: I've got another we...

Scott Morrison - avatar Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News

KIERAN GILBERT: Kieran Gilbert here with you and the Prime Minister joins me. Prime Minister, thanks so much for your time.  PRIME MINISTER: G'day Kieran.  GILBERT: An assumption a vaccine is ...

Daily Bulletin - avatar Daily Bulletin

Business News

Getting Ready to Code? These Popular and Easy Programming Languages Can Get You Started

According to HOLP (History Encyclopedia of Programing Languages), there are more than 8,000 programming languages, some dating as far back as the 18th century. Although there might be as many pr...

News Co - avatar News Co

Avoid These Mistakes When Changing up Your Executive Career

Switching up industries is a valid move at any stage in your career, even if you’re an executive. Doing so at this stage can be a lot more intimidating, however, and it can be quite difficult know...

News Co - avatar News Co

4 Costly Mistake To Avoid When Subdividing Your Property

As a property developer or landowner, the first step in developing your land is subdividing it. You subdivide the property into several lots that you either rent, sell or award to shareholders. ...

News Co - avatar News Co

News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion