Yet it might be worth the money.
In late January, Morrison was continually criticised for appearing to lack compassion over the bushfires.
He himself said, “there are things I could have handed on the ground much better”.
There are signs he has taken that to heart during the coronavirus outbreak.
He has acknowledged unknowns and people’s fear of the unknown, and used inclusive language along the lines of, “together we will get through this”.
It’s been more than getting the narrative right. We’ve seen capable and compassionate leadership, even “servant leadership”.
Problems, not projects, make leaders. Real leaders faced with real problems put their followers before themselves.
Servant leadership works
Research shows that “servant leaders” make good leaders.
Their stories explain the success of many of the Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For, including Zappos.com, Marriot International, and TDIndustries.
In a recently published state-of-the-art review of servant leadership, we argue that servant leadership makes sense empirically, financially and psychologically.
Our review of 285 studies on servant leadership in 39 countries finds the approach creates better leader-follower relationships, in turn boosting performance metrics including employee satisfaction and well being, commitment, and innovation.
It can help in the polls
It is probably why we react positively in the polls when our political leaders show compassion.
The latest Newspoll suggests his approach to the coronavirus has done him no harm.
Financially, servant leadership is a worthwhile investment because it is correlated with individual, team, and organisational performance better than other forms of leadership.
Psychologically, it helps individuals shift from a concern for themselves towards a concern for others, creating a culture of service.
Authors: Sen Sendjaya, Professor of Leadership, Swinburne University of Technology